(This article was revised on 12/06/2007 to reflect new data that has been released about Gardasil.)


Advertise With Us

If you’ve watched TV or picked up a magazine in the past 6 months, you’re probably drowning in advertisements for the “cervical cancer vaccine.” And besides the millions (and millions and more millions) of dollars Merck is pumping into advertising the product, the controversy spawned by vaccinating young, assumingly not-sexually active, girls has pushed the product to the forefront of the media (I’m not intending to get mixed up in that controversy, other than to say that getting a vaccine – by itself – is not going to stimulate young girls – or women - to become sexually active). All this education and promotion is a good thing, because it encourages women to get vaccinated against a disease that is a killer.

I am in an education field that deals directly with genital warts and cervical warts (for the purposes of this article I am going to refer to genital warts as all types that don’t reside on the cervix and cervical warts as those types that do and can lead to cervical cancer). Nationwide, we have a serious problem with both classes of warts. You can go to any scholarly site on the internet, the governmental databases, or search any university library and find enough data on the prevalence of genital and cervical warts to match Merck’s hype. HPV is easily transmitted and extremely prevalent across various demographics. The question is not if we as a society need this vaccine, or if women should get vaccinated for genital warts, but if the behavior of Merck in pricing the product.

Understandably, when Gardasil was released, like most people in the health care field, I was pleased. We finally got a vaccine HPV vaccine.

The Cost of Gardasil – Money Doesn’t Grow on Trees

I was blown over when the Merck Pharmaceutical Reps I initially spoke with announced the street price of the product.

Complete effectiveness requires three doses of vaccine. Our local chapter of Planned Parenthood charges approximately $180 for the first dose and $165 for the second and third doses. That brings the total to $510. Our local average across different types of provider is: $500 +/- $50. Any new drug takes hundreds of millions of dollars to bring it to market, and in Merck’s defense they need to recover some of this money through sales. Likewise, it is usually more expensive to produce a pharmaceutical initially than it is over the long haul (for a variety of reasons). The Merck Drug Reps I spoke with were quick to point out that money doesn’t grow on trees.

The Effectiveness of Gardasil-

“HPV Types 16 and 18 cause 70% of cervical cancer cases, and HPV Types 6 and 11 cause 90% of genital warts cases” (directly from Merck). Merck accurately and prominently states that, “GARDASIL may not fully protect everyone and does not prevent all types of cervical cancer.” (Author’s note: not all cases of cervical cancer are caused by HPV infections). There are about 26 other strains that infect the genitalia.

Recently a new study of the vaccine (by Dr Darren R Brown at Indiana University School of Medicine) of 11,000 women, showed that the vaccine is 38% effective against 10 other strains of HPV that are thought to cause 20% of cervical cancer. Gardasil is 45 per cent effective again types 45 and 31.

This means that the same vaccine that was released onto the market produces antibodies with cross-reactivity to other types of Human Papilloma Virus.

There is every reason to suspect that Merck will be testing Gardasil in women older than 26 and in men. Hopefully these tests will indicate that Gardasil is safe and effective in these groups also.

Merck Gardasil Marketing and Business Strategy – Money Does Grow on Trees.

If all this number talk is mind-boggling, it’s supposed to be. It distracts you from one of the real issues that Merck would rather not have you ponder.

Merck is directly responsible for pricing this product. And it is a product that every woman (and actually every man) needs. Nobody wants cervical cancer or genital warts and Merck knows people flock to it no matter what the price is. When I expressed my concerns to Merck Pharmaceutical Reps about the price of the vaccine, they immediately counter with, “most insurance companies are paying 100% for it.” Soon, with the legal changes that are likely forthcoming, they will be able to add, “and if not, (insert any federal or state agency here) will.”

So the consumer is left thinking, “Great, I can be vaccinated for free,” and the consumer doesn’t complain as Merck has saved them from a horrible disease – and at no charge. Merck bills the proverbial money tree, the insurance companies and feds, $500 and nobody questions this payout. It is clear that the bean-counters at the insurance companies have done the proper calculations and have figured that preventing genital and cervical warts with a vaccine is cheaper than having to treat the diseases (that’s one major factor if/when insurance companies decide to cover a vaccine). And they are right, treating genital warts isn’t cheap, and an initial diagnosis can cause hundreds (or thousands) of dollars in DNA typing, colposcopy, cervical biopsies, specialist visits, etc. This doesn’t even begin to cover pain and suffering, emotional issues, and a host of intangible negatives from getting a viral sexually transmitted disease. HPV cases are regular occurrences in most clinics that offer gynecology services, and for those that have it, insurance is bearing most of the costs.

Drive the customer to want your product, have it mandated by the public health system, have a third party pay you for it. I actually don’t have any problem with this – especially with a vaccine that is going to save so many lives and prevent suffering. My problem is, based on the potential market and the forthcoming vaccination laws requiring the product for huge groups of people, that right now Merck, the only company with an approved HPV vaccine, has the opportunity to price gouge $500 per person for Gardasil.

You may be thinking, “As long as I don’t have to pay for it, I don’t care.” Well you may not be paying for it out of your pocket, but your insurance company or your taxes are (or will soon be) paying for it. If you’re like most of us you directly pay taxes and insurance costs with each paycheck. Every excess dollar that Merck makes (above what is a reasonable profit for them, after all they do have to make a profit here), is money that your insurance company doesn’t have available to pay for your other vaccines, for other mediations, or for better health care for you.

You Should Get Vaccinated for HPV and You Should Vaccinate Your Children

If you have read this far and you are thinking that I am suggesting that you don’t get vaccinated for HPV – or you don’t vaccinate your kids for HPV, you are missing my point. This is a great vaccine that could save your or your children’s life, thousands of dollars in health care costs, and a lifetime of suffering. Call you doctor, Planned Parenthood, or local public health service, and make an appointment to get Gardasil as soon as you are through reading this.

I am not urging a boycott of the product. I am not suggesting that insurance companies and federal agencies shouldn’t mandate this as a public health measure. I believe it is a necessary vaccine in the same way that polio, hepatitis B, and all other vaccines are. In the long run it is the best public health choice. Genital warts and cervical warts can easily be classified as epidemics – and not just in those populations who have multiple partners and are typically seen as sexually promiscuous. You can have sex with one person and get HPV. Right now the vaccine is only approved for use in women between the ages of 9 and 26. If the vaccine proves effective in women of other ages and men, then I think those people should be vaccinated, too.

Yes, people should get vaccinated for HPV, but I also think that along with that it is time to start demanding some explanations from Merck about the pricing of this product. Likewise, our insurance companies and federal and state agencies need to look deeper into this. If they enact laws that make the vaccine mandatory, they have even more accountability for ensuring that Merck is acting responsibly.

When you meet somebody from Merck ask them when are they going to lower the price of this product. When you get vaccinated tell your doctor that the vaccine is too expensive even if your insurance company is paying for it. If you are in the health care field, when a Merck rep comes to speak with you, tell them the price of Gardasil is too high. Ask your state and federal legislators to look into this.

If we are paying $500 dollars to vaccinate every person for against “cervical cancer”, it begs an even scarier question. How much will the next breakthrough vaccine cost us?

Feel free to leave a comment on the form provided.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

"Is Merck Price Gouging With Gardasil HPV Vaccine? The Most Expensive Vaccine Ever." by Chet was published on February 21st, 2007 and is listed in Sexuality.

Follow comments via the RSS Feed | Leave a comment | Trackback URL

Comments on "Is Merck Price Gouging With Gardasil HPV Vaccine? The Most Expensive Vaccine Ever.": 9 Comments

  1. La Reina Arkseteyn wrote,

    I just talked to my doctor about Gardasil- he did not mention the price, only that it would be a good idea to get. But $500?!!! That is insane!!! Not everybody can afford a $500 vaccine. Does it cost hundreds of dollars to make 1 vaccine (3 doses per person)? That cost does not make it available to everyone especially when there are high living expenses and bills to pay. What do we do, set up a savings account so we can get this vaccine?

  2. Chet wrote,

    La Reina Arkseteyn said

    I just talked to my doctor about Gardasil- he did not mention the price, only that it would be a good idea to get. But $500?!!! That is insane!!! Not everybody can afford a $500 vaccine. Does it cost hundreds of dollars to make 1 vaccine (3 doses per person)? That cost does not make it available to everyone especially when there are high living expenses and bills to pay. What do we do, set up a savings account so we can get this vaccine?

    La Reina,

    If you have health insurance, call them and see if they cover the Gardasil vaccine. In my experience, most US health care providers are paying for it.

    My article wasn’t intended to dissuade anybody from getting Gardasil (just the opposite, I hope). I wanted to raise issues about how much Merck and their stockholders were making on the backs of the public and our insurance providers, and to question the ethics of them pricing this product as they have.

  3. Nissa wrote,

    I am currently in a debacle with University of Colorado Hospital over the price of my Gardasil vaccine. I was charged $785.46 for the drug alone on my first visit. This does not even include the “clinic fee” (syringe, alcohol prep, and standing in the hallway). The next shot they charged me $360 for the drug, and $26.89 for the supplies to administer it. I am still awaiting the outrageous bill for the third shot. I am disappointed to say that I was never told this vaccine was going to cost me well over $1000. I actually researched it before I went in for the visit and was expecting to pay around $120-$150 per shot. I can only hope to advocate for public health agencies and not private institutions since they have no shame reaping the benefits of private paying parties.

  4. bill wrote,

    As a physician i am paying $120 /dose and getting reimbursed $121/dose.So you feel that your getting charged too much and we are getting reimbursed too little
    Can you see ordering 100 doses of this and getting little in return
    Yet private clinics etc charge so much more
    and when another breakthrough vaccine comes along the problem will only get worse
    I only hope that each state will create a universal vaccine program to provide all of these vaccines for free because not many businesses can buy a product for a penny and get 2 cents back

  5. Valeria wrote,

    What is a person without any health care insurance supposed to do?

  6. Brian wrote,

    Vaccines are very poor economic deals for drug companies for several reasons.

    1. Most vaccines are only administered once or one series per person. Compared with chronic drugs like cholesterol, pain, diabetes medications and more, where a patient will be paying for tablets every day for the rest of their lives, vaccines have a much smaller revenue pool.

    2. Clinical research is very expensive. The average new drug costs several hundred million dollars to develop. If you’re dividing that among billions of tablets, each can be inexpensive, but sales forecasts for gardasil are only for young females - there are perhaps a few tens of millions of total units to be sold, over many years. The price must be in the hundreds of dollars per unit just to break even on development costs.

    3. Vaccine research is much more expensive than for most drugs. For many indications, clinical research is looking for a positive response in a short time period, i.e.: “the infection went away in three days”, “the pain was reduced in 2 hours”, etc. But for gardasil, every patient in the trial had to be followed for 5 years, just to see that they *didn’t* get HPV. And the trial had to be large enough to have a large control group so that enough of the control patients did get HPV to show a statistically significant difference from the gardasil group.

  7. Chet wrote,

    Brian said

    Vaccines are very poor economic deals for drug companies for several reasons.

    1. Most vaccines are only administered once or one series per person. Compared with chronic drugs like cholesterol, pain, diabetes medications and more, where a patient will be paying for tablets every day for the rest of their lives, vaccines have a much smaller revenue pool.

    2. Clinical research is very expensive. ….If you’re dividing that among billions of tablets, each can be inexpensive, but sales forecasts for gardasil are only for young females - there are perhaps a few tens of millions of total units to be sold, over many years.

    3. Vaccine research is much more expensive than for most drugs.

    While it may be true that many or even most vaccines are not as profitable as other pharmaceuticals for drug companies, I’m not sure that your argument is an accurate reflection in the case of Gardasil.

    1) Gardasil is three injections and there is no data about if, when, or how often people will have to receive a booster in the future.

    2) Sales forecasts aren’t just for young females. Medical News Today Reports that “Merck & Co., Inc. announced that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has accepted, and designated for priority review, the supplemental Biologics License Application (sBLA) for GARDASIL® [Human Papillomavirus Quadrivalent] (Types 6, 11, 16, 18) Vaccine, Recombinant] for the potential use in women aged 27 through 45.” So yes, they are intending on vaccinating groups other than “young women.” Likewise I have been told by Merck representatives that trials are going on to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Gardasil in men. We’re not taking about some obscure vaccine that only a few people will be getting here.

    3) For the record. Merck’s own 2007 earnings reports indicates that Merck is making tons of money on this product. “The Company’s cervical cancer vaccine, GARDASIL, posted total sales as recorded by Merck of $339 million for the fourth quarter and $1.5 billion for the year. As of the fourth quarter, GARDASIL has been approved in 93 countries, many under fast track or expedited review, with launches under way in 76 of those countries. The vaccine remains under review in approximately 40 other countries and territories.”

    I don’t think it would take much work to show that Merck is in fact price gouging on this product. Your comments are correct with respect to most vaccines, but I don’t believe that they apply in this case. Gardasil certainly isn’t a “poor economic deal” for Merck. They are intending the product to be used in every human being in every country. Again, I’m not saying that Gardasil isn’t an important product, but that Merck is, in fact, price gouging us for it.

  8. Michelle wrote,

    I have Blue Cross Blue Shield PPO coverage and my Dr. probably do to the fact that he does not make much profit from the vaccine, told me to order it directly from CVS pharmacy. I paid the $25 co-pay for the medication and then another $20 copay for a Dr. visit to have a nurse administer the shot. This may be an option for those not able nor willing to pay such high prices.

  9. anonymous wrote,

    Insurance companies are thiefs - and the doctors, republicans are a lot to blame. - I am not a politics nut, but I have been working in the medical profession for 29 years - The drug companies have so much money - they lavish the doctors with gifts, lavish vacations, dinner parties, etc. They could put this money to better use or instead of spending millions or billions of dollars on their pimps, they could lower their prices on their medications - the rich just get richer and the poor can usually get Medicaid or…? It is not fair. I have a 14 year old daughter - I am a single working mom who does have insurance, but unfortunately this is one treatment insurance does not cover. Where are people like us to go? The poor can go to their Community Health Departments to receive this vaccination free, but we, who are working every day trying to make a living - have this denied by our insurance co. I love my daughter and this is one gift I would love to give her -

Leave Your Comment

Subscribe without commenting

Click Screenshots To Enlarge

  • Wordpress Theme Skin for Shifter - Over It (Glass)
  • Change between thin, wide and full width layouts without destroying your site structure.
  • Wordpress Theme Skin for Shifter - Over It (Light)
  • Choose between single or double sidebars and then shift sidebar width or position with the flip of a switch.
  • Wordpress Theme Skin for Shifter - Lizard (Dark)
  • One, two or three column layouts have never been easier.
  • Wordpress Theme Skin for Shifter - Brown
  • 15 skins let you choose the end look for your site without destroying the structure of your perfect layout.
  • Wordpress Theme Skin for Shifter - News Red
  • Shifter makes designing your site easier, faster and more enjoyable - all with the flip of a switch!

Wearing the Basic Skin for Shifter by Buzzdroid